How To Sell To A Food Scientist- A Suppliers Guide

Food Scientists of the Future (1994)

Food Scientists of the Future (1994)

A supplier asked me the other day: “How do I connect with my food scientist R&D clients and get them to buy my ingredients versus someone else’s?” He started asking me about Facebook and LinkedIn and Twitter, or about organizing IFT parties or fancy dinners.

How to connect with your client really depends on what generation they are from. A food scientist graduating this year is quite different from the Baby Boomer food scientist, who is different from a Gen-Xer (like me).

Let’s start with the Millennials (age 28 and younger) the youngest generation of food scientists. Many are just graduating, in entry-level positions or still attending graduate school. These are the new guys, the children of the ingredient company’s future. So why are you ignoring them?  Suppliers often will skip over this younger entry-level crowd because they don’t have buying power or they are not part of the top-level decision making crew. Well, just because they have no say now doesn’t mean they won’t have any say later on. I will never forget that National Starch (now Ingredion) and CP Kelco were the only ones who invited me to anything at IFT 1991. I was just a student wearing ugly shoes and collecting free expo floor stuff and they handed me an invite and said “we love having all the students come by our hospitality suite!”  Another way to connect is to actually go to the local universities and give a seminar to the graduating seniors. Sponsor an event, bring goodie bags, talk about your products and then take the whole Food Science Club out to the local brewery and talk yeast shop with them. Offer up scholarships to their departments and try to make your mark on them while they are still in school. Follow them on Twitter, connect with them on LinkedIn and, if you really want to make an impression, read their graduate thesis and have a discussion with them about it. They won’t forget you, I promise.

Moving into Gen-X (that would be me, the 30 to 44 year olds). We have all been working for a long time. We have been to the parties and done the shows and, at this point, many of us have families and kids so we don’t have time to go out to eat or network the way we used to. There is one thing we do like though: We like our suppliers to be extremely responsive all the time. When we request documents, send them immediately or at least reply and tell us it’s “on the way.” We want you to support us by showing us ingredients in application and feeding us literature with trend ideas. Anything to make our job easier will make us want to call you more.  But please make sure that your support is applicable. If we make salsa and you sell flavors, show us those flavors in a salsa and not in a confectionery product.  We like culinary presentations and we prefer to “do lunch” instead of dinner. At the trade shows, we probably have serious research to do so contact us well in advance and find a time to meet that is convenient for us. Don’t try to bribe and don’t try to “sell” us anything we don’t need. Don’t go over our head and try to get procurement to convince us to buy your ingredients. And, if you have to increase prices, we need a really good explanation, because most likely we are going to be stuck doing a cost-reduction project. If you really want us to do dinner at a trade show, pick a place that has meaningful food; we are the foodie generation and we want every meal to be worth it.

The last group is the Baby Boomers (ages 45 to 63). This is the generation that may be retiring soon, are probably in higherpositions and have been reading hard copies of the technical food trade journals since the 1960s. They probably don’t tweet, they may or may not be on LinkedIn, they probably won’t join your company’s Facebook group page. They are responsible for managing whole teams of food scientists, are rarely on the bench and are leaving the nitty-gritty ingredient decisions up to the bench jockeys. The Baby Boomer food scientists like research and reading materials and are probably more interested in research trends and the latest world disaster that is having an impact on commodity ingredient prices. They want the bottom line information in bullet point format.  They might have a corner office with a view, and it is probably overflowing with journals and seminar binders. They have been at their company a long time and are experts in their field. Brush up on your food science when you meet with this generation and ask intelligent questions. Baby Boomers will be at the trade shows, but since they have probably done this 50 times before, they don’t want to spend the whole day at expo; they probably want to have a quiet dinner at a traditional steakhouse that is not too trendy and has good wine.

I may be focusing on the networking here and the schmoozing parts, but honestly,  there are a million ingredient suppliers out there and many of them are quite good and competitive in pricing. You need to do more than just offer a premium product at a reasonable price. You need to be our friend, our trend advisor and, most importantly, prove yourself to be our “supplier partner.”

I am stereotyping all the food science generations here. There may very well be Baby Boomers who spend all day on the expo floor and hit seven supplier parties in one night. They may be developing on the bench and doing pilot runs at 4 a.m.. Or, there could be lots of 20-somethings who have no interest in networking with you and just want samples and price. But, the bottom line is there are not that many food scientists in general (only about 300 graduates per year in the U.S.) and it should not be too hard to maintain a constant presence in their working life, regardless of their generation. Be fun, be helpful and be smart. Know your product, send ingredients quickly, get us the documentation. Stay up-to-date on culinary trends in both retail and foodservice and please stop asking us for our Fed Ex# and just overnight us a sample!

Posted in Intrepid Blog, Research and Development, The Daily Feeding | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Juice Cleanse 101

The Juice cleanse market has exploded this year! There are fresh “cold press” juice shops showing up all over the place and they typically will either do a fresh press right there on the spot, or you can partake in their “grab and go” –taking one of the rectangular bottles with the ingredients proudly displayed on the side.

But beware! There are two separate processes that the juice companies are using. One process results in a 3-day shelf life and the other gives you a 30 day shelf life. Both companies package up their juices similarly and both charge the same high price of 8 to 10 dollars for 12 oz. They all deliver across the U.S. allowing regular people and celebrities alike to do their 3-day juice fast right from home.

Some companies like The Pressed Juicery use the hydraulic press, which grinds up the fruit and then applies thousands of pounds of pressure to cold press out every drop of juice. They may spend a few thousand on one of Dr. Walkers Hydraulic Press Juicers which turns raw produce into a mash (releasing all the vitamins and “enzymes”) and then applies extreme pressure (6,000 PSI) to extract the juice. There is minimal air contact so the final product is a fresh tasting smooth raw beverage that can maintain freshness for up to 3 days in the fridge.

Other companies are taking advantage of the HPP or High Pressure Process for their raw juices. This process is very expensive and is currently being done on products like Blueprint Juice and Harmless Coconut . These juices taste just as good as the hydraulic pressed juices but are actually SAFER! The bacteria load has been reduced by high pressure (instead of heat) after the juice is in its bottle- and this allows them to last up to 30 days in the refrigerator, just like a heat-pasteurized juice.

So while this juice craze has taken the nation by storm (or at least it feels that way to me, living in northern California) all the companies, both HPP and hydraulic press are packing them up and shipping them all over the place in very similar looking bottles and with similar prices. It’s easy to get confused about which bottles are HPP and which are not and it is important to know the difference. I personally would not want to receive a hydraulic pressed juice in the mail- Too much handling going on there, and too many opportunities for a breakdown in the system. I would only want to buy it in a store that presses and refrigerated and monitors the time from press to purchase. Now the HPP juices are another story- with their reduced bacterial loads and longer shelf life, and the fact that they are made in a manufacturing plant that probably has a vigorous safety and quality-testing program in place- I feel better somehow going with those juices. There are only a few facilities that practice HPP and there are many hydraulic pressed juice joints. I don’t know them and I don’t know their families!

HPP is a very expensive process and many juice companies cannot afford to go down that path. However with potential pathogens lurking in raw “NON-HPP-ED” juices, and with the pricing being roughly the same- isn’t it worth it to get the safer versions? Less than a year ago it was difficult to find these HPP juices but now they are everywhere, even in Starbucks. So play it safe, go HPP (read the packaging, they usually say HPP if they are, or have some sort of a warning if they are not)  and don’t order your hydraulic juices online.

Posted in The Daily Feeding, Food Safety, IFT, Debunking False Propaganda! | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

The Worth of A Food Scientist-

It’s already August and I am waiting patiently for the IFT Membership Employment and Salary Survey to come out. The last update was 2009 and they only post the survey every two years. This survey is, for some, the only way to negotiate a fair wage for what is probably the most important role/job in a food manufacturing company.

Circa 1990...

U-Mass Brochure Circa 1990…

What is the role of the food scientist? While the job details may vary, in general a food scientist is there to ensure that the manufactured food is safe, tastes good, is packaged properly, and is in compliance with government regulations. Contrary to popular belief, food scientists are not nutritionists, chefs or restaurant managers (although they can be trained in those areas and perform those functions in addition to their food science tasks). As a matter of fact, when people ask me if I am a nutritionist, I usually respond by saying, “No, they actually care what goes into your body—and I don’t.” It’s not that I personally do not care, but that is not my job in the company. I am there to make sure whatever concept marketing, sales, CEO, COO, culinary, etc. want to develop is done as correctly, safety and inexpensively as possible, and meets the requirements and requests of everyone in the organization. I don’t judge the nutritional content or the organic status or how sustainable the item is. Those were decisions that I made when taking the job in the first place and knowing what the company stands for.

 

Without the food scientist there can be no finished product. End of story. From the entry-level technologist to the more seasoned R&D expert, most food scientists are simply not being paid what they deserve, and I blame this on the fact that there are so few of us that we have no true data or understanding of what we are actually worth and, as a result, are afraid or intimidated to ask for more money. It doesn’t help that only 2,728 people filled out and returned that IFT survey.

So here are a few facts that a company should consider when trying to decide how much to pay their food scientist:

  1. A product recall can cost a company millions, and a food scientist can decrease the odds of that happening. Most product recalls happen because of mislabeled products or a misunderstanding of labeling laws.
  2. Labeling errors can delay a product’s time to market. A food scientist can expedite this process, because they know how to use Genesis and read the Code of Federal Regulations.
  3. In 2010, there were 591 food science graduates. That number represents how many people in the entire USA graduated with food science degrees.
  4. You need them more than they need you; they have options.

And some facts that a food scientist should consider when being offered a salary that is below their expectation:

  1. Most experienced food scientists in their 30s are married, have kids, own a house that they probably can’t sell and don’t want to move, which means the company does not have many options!
  2. They need you more than you need them, and you are probably the best candidate they have seen so far!

Most of what I have written here applies to experienced food scientists, but entry-level food scientists also have lots of opportunities. Sometimes recent grads don’t see these opportunities because they feel that they must stay in the area where they went to school, or where their family lives. To the youngins out there, if you really are dedicated to the field, then it won’t kill you to move out of state for a few years and get some experience. You can always go back to your favorite city later on with a degree, experience and more options. But no graduating food scientist will ever be jobless unless by choice. There are way too many empty positions out there.

But going back to the companies again, Pay your food scientist what they are worth, because they will save you time, extend your products’ shelf life, get it to market safety and make sure you are in compliance with FDA and USDA regulations. So as you consider what salary is appropriate, ask yourself what is food safety and brand reputation worth to you, because without a qualified food scientist on staff, you are putting your company on the line.

So take the IFT Salary Survey 2011 with a grain of salt and add about 20% more too every salary listed.

Posted in Research and Development, The Daily Feeding | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A World Without Food Science

This year there were 350 students in the entire United States that graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Food Science. It used to baffle me that so few people choose to enter into a field that is not only fun and interesting but is pretty much GUARANTEED job placement for life. But now I believe I have figured out why!

When is the last time you saw a food scientist on TV or in the media portrayed in a positive way? When is the last time a food company showed off their great food scientists to the world (not including the ads in food technology magazines that are created by and exclusively for food scientists). When is the last time a food scientist was nationally thanked for making the food supply safe, interesting and delicious?

How about never? There is absolutely no mention of food scientists because food manufacturers have decided it makes more sense to let the masses believe that all their food was prepared especially for them by silly rabbits, green giants, doughboys and a hamburger helper “hand”. While I can appreciate the need to lure in children and adults via the use of icons, would it hurt if the companies gave the food scientists just a little bit of publicity—if not to thank us for all our hard work but to at least promote the field in general by showing all that we can do? This would only help to generate interest and fill those emptying food science slots.

Well, actually it probably would hurt them because companies don’t want the masses to know that their food is *GASP* made by people who wear lab coats and studied science, because making food is an art and a craft not a science, right? Why would anyone want to create food in an organized safe and routine way? Much better to imagine that your cookies are being manufactured in a tree by elves or in aunt Jemima’s probably-not-HACCP-certified kitchen.

Considering the number of calls I get daily from recruiters begging me (and even offering me commission!) to help them find someone to fill this or that food science position, you would think that food companies would want to help promote the talent whom without they could not exist, and to help fill the empty positions all over the country.

I went to a Chicago section IFT dinner a few weeks ago and president John Ruff talked about the new and improved IFT (www.ift.org) website. There are some great links on the site to salary surveys, interviews with food scientists and educational opportunities. It was pointed out at the dinner that the website really preaches to the choir, and the only ones who go there are the ones who are already “in” the field. But then John showed us this chilling video, World Without Food Science™, a public education campaign created by the Institute of Food Technologists to generate awareness of the role that food science plays in ensuring a nutritious, safe and abundant food supply.

The video is chilling, but has a positive, upbeat ending that could inspire high school students to enter into this wide-open job market.

Posted in Debunking False Propaganda!, Food Safety, IFT, Research and Development, The Daily Feeding, Videos | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

The Soul of A New Product

I moved to Chicago last May because Kraft Foods offered me a contract position to help them develop a new line of Miracle Whip Branded Dipping Sauces. It has been an exciting project to work on and fascinating to experience the inner workings of one of the largest food companies in the world. Coming from the world of Bay Area start ups—where recalls are a rite of passage and shelf life study translates to “lets see when the consumers start complaining to determine our best by date”—it has been an eye-opener to learn that companies like Kraft have such an amazing team of food scientists and in-house experts that no quality or safety stone is ever left unturned. The product is looked at from a hundred different angles before being released to the masses.

My Babies

My Babies

While I have always felt that a food scientist’s signature should be part of the product packaging design, or at least a small photo of them stamped next to the Use By date, that usually never happens. However, with the pending release of my three new dipping sauces—Sassy Sweet Tomato, Kickin’ Onion Blossom and Smokin’ Bacon Ranch—I couldn’t help mentioning—just a little bit—in passing, “hey, I worked on that.” Is that so wrong?  It’s not enough that my parents have all three sauces proudly on display on the kitchen counter, I feel like I need to speak on behalf of all food scientists who have given their blood, sweat and tears to develop a product from concept through to commercialization.  You know who you are and what you have done. The bench top samples, the marketing critiques, the pilot plant studies, the specification writing, late night production runs and shelf life studies. A lot goes into the development of a new product and we have all experienced the excitement and stress involved in this process.

But it’s all worth it when we walk down the supermarket aisles and can tell our family and friends: “I INVENTED that!” Sometimes I even tell strangers who are checking out the product, debating whether to buy it or not—“It’s a great product. Want to hear more about how it was born?” Now, I am not saying that I did everything by myself. Of course there were many other people involved in the process. The marketing team, the food safety experts, the quality control department, the packaging group, the sensory scientists and the regulatory guys who know the CFRs like the back of their hands. They all helped and were a part of the process, but I think that the food scientist feels a special bond with the product they developed—we were with it from day one and saw it evolve from a tiny idea to a supermarket staple.

So, like a writer who just published a possible bestseller, I anxiously waited for the online blogger reviews of my product. I was thrilled to find an online review by the food blogger Tired Dad Dave of 2 Wired 2 Tired, who described it as “full of flavor” and he can’t wait to create a “recipe or two.” Thanks Tired Dad Dave!!

I know all of my developer friends out there have created something they are proud of in 2012.  Share below in the comments section and let us know!

Posted in Research and Development, The Daily Feeding | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment